CJR Needs a Blogosphere Dictionary

July 28th, 2007

I laughed my ass off. Paul McLeary at the Columbia Journalism Review needs a blogosphere dictionary.

This is great. The conservative blogosphere and it’s kissin’ cousin, the milblog community–who always criticize the left for not supporting the troops–is engaging in some troop hating of its own. Their target, of course, is Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, of TNR fame, and he’s taking a beating by critics who apparently have nothing better to do than furiously Google his name all night long and troll his MySpace page.

This childish game of name-calling, mostly led by the know-nothing Michelle Malkin’s of the world–anyone remember the Jamil Hussein embarassment–has been going on for the better part of a week. Now the Weekly Standard’s Michael Goldfarb dug up some particularly damning evidence against the young soldier:


We do know that Beauchamp worked on Howard Dean’s presidential campaign, that he edited a liberal student magazine in college, and that he marched with pro-choice demonstrators in 2004. Further, we know that he enlisted in the military “just to write a book” about his experience–not the noblest of reasons, but neither does it discredit his work. Writing under a pseudonym, though, did prevent readers from understanding that his perspective was not merely that of a soldier on the ground, but of a political activist.

How dare a college grad and engaged citizen volunteer to join the Army to fight for his country! (Which is something that most of the brave souls who inhabit the milblog community prefers to leave to others.)

Pauly, baby. Milbloggers, are soldiers or veterans. That’s what makes them milbloggers. Try knowing what you’re talking about before going after someone.

Oh, and BTW, why did he put an apostrophe behind “Malkin”?

mostly led by the know-nothing Michelle Malkin’s of the world

?

2 Responses to “CJR Needs a Blogosphere Dictionary”

  1. kim Says:

    In his last, parenthesized, sentence the subject and predicate don’t agree, either.

    CJR still stands by its article claiming the Rather forgeries were real.
    ============================



  2. HughS Says:

    Kim
    That is teh funnnee!



Leave a Reply