Comments on: AP Picks Up on Beauchamp Story http://amerpundit.com/2007/08/09/ap-picks-up-on-beauchamp-story/ Conservative Commentary on American Politics Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:20:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: TNR Responds Again http://amerpundit.com/2007/08/09/ap-picks-up-on-beauchamp-story/comment-page-1/#comment-9502 TNR Responds Again Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:37:41 +0000 http://amerpundit.com/2007/08/09/ap-picks-up-on-beauchamp-story/#comment-9502 [...] was reported in the Liberal-slanted Washington Post. The questioning has been reported by the Liberal-slanted Associated Press, too. Despite Melissa McEwan of Liberal blog Shakespeare’s sister noting that the detail [...] [...] was reported in the Liberal-slanted Washington Post. The questioning has been reported by the Liberal-slanted Associated Press, too. Despite Melissa McEwan of Liberal blog Shakespeare’s sister noting that the detail [...]

]]> By: Guy Montag http://amerpundit.com/2007/08/09/ap-picks-up-on-beauchamp-story/comment-page-1/#comment-9491 Guy Montag Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:27:44 +0000 http://amerpundit.com/2007/08/09/ap-picks-up-on-beauchamp-story/#comment-9491 EVERYTHING from "Shock Troops" is a UCMJ violation under 934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE. Why is Franklin Foer shielding war criminals, if he really believes the story as strongly as he says? If you were submitting articles that were generally okay and then dropped a story on your editor where you participated in crimes and then your editor confirmed with your conspirators that, indeed, they helped you commit crimes, wouldn't the editor be morally obligated to forward the evidence to the proper authorities? Wouldn't it be silly of an editor to demand the authorities fork over their investigative documents to him so reporters could write another story about the investigation? That is the latest that Mr. Foer is demanding. BTW, the BAE Bradley Expert that TNR interviewed is Mr. Doug Coffey and he holds a differing opinion from what TNR "re-reported" in their 'investigation'. The fairbanksing gets deeper and deeper. EVERYTHING from “Shock Troops” is a UCMJ violation under 934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE. Why is Franklin Foer shielding war criminals, if he really believes the story as strongly as he says?

If you were submitting articles that were generally okay and then dropped a story on your editor where you participated in crimes and then your editor confirmed with your conspirators that, indeed, they helped you commit crimes, wouldn’t the editor be morally obligated to forward the evidence to the proper authorities? Wouldn’t it be silly of an editor to demand the authorities fork over their investigative documents to him so reporters could write another story about the investigation?

That is the latest that Mr. Foer is demanding.

BTW, the BAE Bradley Expert that TNR interviewed is Mr. Doug Coffey and he holds a differing opinion from what TNR “re-reported” in their ‘investigation’.

The fairbanksing gets deeper and deeper.

]]>