I received the tip from Andy about an hour ago, but I had been out at dinner, so only saw it now. After the revelation of the first plant, I wasn’t surprised if we’d hear that it’s happened elsewhere. And it may have.

SIOUX CITY, Iowa —  For the second time in as many days, Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has had to deal with accusations of planting questions during public appearances, FOX News has learned.

In a telephone interview Saturday, Geoffrey Mitchell, 32, said he was approached by Clinton campaign worker Chris Hayler to ask a question about how she was standing up to President Bush on the question on funding the Iraq war and a troop withdrawal timeline.

The encounter happened before an event hosted by Iowa State Sen. Gene Frais on a farm outside Fort Madison, Iowa.

Clinton’s Iowa campaign confirmed to Fox News that one of its staff discussed questions with Mitchell before her April 2 event, but denied attempting to plant a pro-Clinton question.

Mo Elliethee, spokesman for Clinton’s campaign in Iowa, told Fox that Hayler and Mitchell “had a previous relationship” and that a discussion about Clinton arose out of a normal conversation between two people who knew each other well.

“They had a previous relationship and were talking before the event and the topic of the senator’s position on Iraq came up and Geoffrey said he had some questions,” Elliethee said. “Chris suggested Geoffrey ask a question.”

Mitchell claims he doesn’t know Chris, though.

“I had no previous relationship with him,” said Mitchell. “I knew his name and by name only as some who worked for Sen. Evan Bayh. But we didn’t know each other and I had never met him before this event.”

Mitchell told Fox the Clinton campaign wanted to contrast Clinton to Sen. Barack Obama who had recently said the president would probably prevail in the Iraq funding battle with Congress.

Mithell said he refused to ask the question.

“I told Chris I had other issues I wanted to raise with Sen. Clinton,” Mitchell said.

Asked what those were, Mitchell said, “I wanted to ask her why she voted for the Iraq war and why she didn’t consider that a mistake.”

Mitchell told FOX News, for that Hayler, the Clinton campaign worker, was unhappy and moved on to others.

“I know he tried to have others ask that question,” Mitchell said.

None of this would surprise me. Especially after Clinton’s screw up regarding licenses for illegal aliens, Obama’s been looking more attractive to the Left. Contrasting her with him would be important.

This also places the Clinton campaign in an interesting condition. It can’t claim “We would never do such a thing”, because, well, it has. Then there’s this:

Asked if the Clinton campaign denied Mitchell’s unequivocal assertion that Hayler tried to plant a question about Clinton trying to stand up to Bush on Iraq war funding, Elliethee declined.

“I’m not going to comment on what he said,” said Elleithee said, referring to Mitchell. “I’m going to discuss what our interpretation is. They had a previous relationship, the subject came up and there’s nothing more to it tha that. It’s not newsworthy. It’s innocent. It’s not yesterday.”

Yes, this isn’t yesterday. We admitting to lying yesterday, but you should believe us over someone who claims something we won’t actually deny. Mitchell continues to stand by his story “completely”. The Clinton campaign has very little comment and, as I said, won’t deny.