If you haven’t see the video of Huckabee’s brief interview with CNN’s John Roberts, please do so. In it, Huckabee claims the Constitution is a “living, breathing” document, after having noted he wishes to bring it in line with the word of God. One eency, weency problem. Technicality, really. His website? Disagrees.

I firmly believe that the Constitution must be interpreted according to its original meaning, and flatly reject the notion of a “living Constitution.”

So which one is it, Huck? Is it, or is it not, a living document? You can’t have it both ways, although I’m sure you wish you could.
Via Bryan.

Leave a Reply