I’m about to do something I don’t think I’ve ever done before: I’m going to ask you to read something at MyDD. Hwc looks at the Obama/Rezko land deal and comes to many of the same conclusions I do:
1) As you can clearly see from the overhead photos in the video, this was clearly NOT an “adjacent” piece of property. This was quite obviously the yard for the Obama house. The only access to the Rezko property is from Obama’s parcel. The intent here was clearly for Rezko to purchase the land and continue making it available for the exclusive use of the Obama family. A $925,000 favor to a sitting US Senator.
Why did Obama buy a strip of “Rezko” land and build a fence? Simple. Obama knew that eventually somebody would photograph the property and the sham nature of the arrangement would be instantly obvious. Thus, he had to do something to give the appearance of Rezko’s land actually being separate from the Obama house. Thus, building a fence (with a gate providing the only access). Obviously, the Rezko property was never intended to be a separate piece of land and a fence on the original lot line would have been absurd…
Does this sham property purchase, regardless of its legality, seem like good “judgement” to you?
There’s more evidence he submits to back his conclusions, and you should definitely read it all. Via Ace.
by Stephan Tawney on Sat, Mar 8, 2008