Former DNC chief Terry McAuliffe gave his own opinion on Scott McClellan’s book. He says (as many of us have) that if McClellan was really upset, he should’ve quit.

“I never like it when someone works for someone and then comes out and writes a book trashing them,” quoth the Macker. “I don’t care if it is politics or life. If he was that upset about everything, he should have quit. Remember, Gerald Ford’s press secretary quit when he disagreed with pardoning, Ford pardoning Nixon. If you don’t agree, then get out. And I just, I find it abhorrent the way these people come out and write books about their boss. It made ‘em money, it made ‘em prestige, it gave them all this power, and then they turn around and slap ‘em. I just, I gotta tell you, I just uh, I don’t care who it is — Democrat, Republican — it’s wrong.”

Correct. If Scott knew the president was misleading the nation into war, why did he stay around voluntarily for another 3 years? Why did he only mention any of this when he decided to write a book?