The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review has ruled President Bush’s warrantless surveillance program constitutional, the New York Times reports. Even conversations involving U.S. citizens are legal, the court says. Here’s a ruling that will enrage the left.

A federal intelligence court, in a rare public opinion, is expected to issue a major ruling validating the power of the president and Congress to wiretap international phone calls and intercept e-mail messages without a court order, even when Americans’ private communications may be involved, according to a person with knowledge of the opinion.

The court decision, made in December by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, is expected to be disclosed as early as Thursday in an unclassified, redacted form, the person said. The review court has issued only two other rulings in its 30-year history.

The decision marks the first time since the disclosure of the National Security Agency’s warrantless eavesdropping program three years ago that an appellate court has addressed the constitutionality of the federal government’s wiretapping powers. In validating the government’s wide authority to collect foreign intelligence, it may offer legal credence to the Bush administration’s repeated assertions that the president has constitutional authority to act without specific court approval in ordering national security eavesdropping.

The appeals court is expected to uphold a secret ruling issued last year by the intelligence court that it oversees, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, or FISA, court. In that initial opinion, the secret court found that Congress had acted within its authority in August of 2007 when it passed a hotly debated law known as the Protect America Act, which gave the executive branch broad power to eavesdrop on international communications, according to the person familiar with the ruling.

There are two major beneficiaries of this ruling, besides the American people: George Bush and Barack Obama. Bush, who has been maligned for years for daring to claim that the executive had the constitutional authority without specific approval, has been vindicated on that front. Obama, whose duty it will be to protect the American people, now specifically has the authority to act to protect the nation without court approval.

By the way, Barack Obam’s nominee for Attorney General, Eric Holder, railed against Bush on this front several months ago. He referred to it as “unlawful” and amounted it to losing our commitment to the Constitution. Apparently not.

More: Hot Air, Ace of Spades.