More specifically, the new WhiteHouse.gov’s agenda list says that Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon is “troubling”. Not “unacceptable” but “troubling”. Good to know that Obama will take a strong stance on this, huh?

• Diplomacy: Barack Obama supports tough and direct diplomacy with Iran without preconditions. Now is the time to use the power of American diplomacy to pressure Iran to stop their illicit nuclear program, support for terrorism, and threats toward Israel. Obama and Biden will offer the Iranian regime a choice. If Iran abandons its nuclear program and support for terrorism, we will offer incentives like membership in the World Trade Organization, economic investments, and a move toward normal diplomatic relations. If Iran continues its troubling behavior, we will step up our economic pressure and political isolation. In carrying out this diplomacy, we will coordinate closely with our allies and proceed with careful preparation. Seeking this kind of comprehensive settlement with Iran is our best way to make progress.

So considering the world has already dangled carrots in front of Iran without success, what are the odds that the Islamic Republic will finally yield its nuclear ambitions in the name of Allah in order to join the WTO? And if, as it likely will, further talks after that fail, what next? If there comes a point where Iran can’t become any more isolated and yet still pursues a nuke, what will President Obama do? How much will we offer in incentives to avoid confrontation?

Oh, and another point. Suddenly we’re back to “without preconditions”? Didn’t candidate Obama spend time trying to claim that he never said that, despite it appearing on his campaign website at the time? Ambinder covered the convenient nuances.

Via HAH.