Question #1: He doesn’t actually expect us to believe that performance was given without him being drunk, right? This must be a wink-wink-nudge-nudge denial.
Question #2: What took his office so long to issue a statement? The video has been prominent for several days now. You’d think they would’ve immediately smacked-down the story if it really was baseless.
Question #3: Why should we believe anything he says? He’s already admitted to having an affair, appointing his mistress as U.S. Attorney, taking her on taxpayer-funded junkets, and giving her a salary increase courtesy of Uncle Sam. He’s not exactly the most trustworthy individual.
Note to Baucus: Just admit you were hammered. You’re already a disgrace (see the previous paragraph). It’s not like your reputation is going to suffer any further by admitting you were drunk on the Senate floor.


by Stephan Tawney on December 29, 2009