Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass), taking into consideration last night’s electoral results in Massachusetts, has ruled out the use of reconciliation — overriding the current rules to require only 51 Senate votes for passage — on the current health care reform debate.

Frank, not exactly known for his strong ethics, is actually showing some strong ethics in his statement. Well, that or he just witnessed a Democrat running for Teddy’s old seat get trampled in his own backyard. Oh, and the same Democrat under-perform in Boston — Barney’s own hometown.

“I have two reactions to the election in Massachusetts. One, I am disappointed. Two, I feel strongly that the Democratic majority in Congress must respect the process and make no effort to bypass the electoral results. If Martha Coakley had won, I believe we could have worked out a reasonable compromise between the House and Senate health care bills. But since Scott Brown has won and the Republicans now have 41 votes in the Senate, that approach is no longer appropriate. I am hopeful that some Republican Senators will be willing to discuss a revised version of health care reform because I do not think that the country would be well-served by the health care status quo. But our respect for democratic procedures must rule out any effort to pass a health care bill as if the Massachusetts election had not happened. Going forward, I hope there will be a serious effort to change the Senate rule which means that 59 votes are not enough to pass major legislation, but those are the rules by which the health care bill was considered, and it would be wrong to change them in the middle of the process.”

Translation: This coming November just got a whole lot more uncomfortable.