What could the leadership of the Ground Zero mosque possibly do to further prove that they’re lying when they talk about tolerance and building bridges?
I mean, the imam has already gone on record backing an Islamic take-over of the legal system and saying the United States deserved the 9/11 attacks. And the leadership refuses to move the mosque despite evidence that the project will insult millions upon millions of Americans.
So how could the leadership team possibly expose its true motivations further? I know! They could mock Judaism.
On a side note, if Haaretz likes publishing fables, perhaps they could go back to the Yiddish ones with parables #welikethosebetter
If you’re missing it, the spokesman is saying that Judaism is a fake, made-up religion. Nothing more than a fairy tale not to be taken seriously.
If I didn’t know better I’d say that these Muslim leaders aren’t actually dedicated to furthering tolerance and repairing bridges. Crazy, I know.
16. August 2010 at 6:47 pm
Does any politician seriously think that allowing the Muslims to build this Victory Mosque will pacify them or prevent further attacks? In fact, it will only encourage them, in the same way that allowing the Nazis to occupy the Rhineland led to their occupation of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland and then the whole of Europe.
The politicians should read the links under ‘Appeasement’ at EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAM
22. August 2010 at 11:08 am
News Corp’s number-two shareholder funded ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ planner
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100820/bs_yblog_upshot/news-corps-number-two-shareholder-funded-terror-mosque-planner