<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The American Pundit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amerpundit.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amerpundit.com</link>
	<description>Conservative Commentary on American Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CNS: Women Working for Obama Get Payed Less Than Men by DYSPEPSIA GENERATION &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNS: Women Working for Obama Get Payed Less Than Men</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/30/cns-women-working-for-obama-get-payed-less-than-men/#comment-57799</link>
		<dc:creator>DYSPEPSIA GENERATION &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNS: Women Working for Obama Get Payed Less Than Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4624#comment-57799</guid>
		<description>[...] Read it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama-Supporting Councilman: Criticism of Mugabe Racist by This ain&#8217;t Hell, but you can see it from here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sunday link fest</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/27/obama-supporting-councilman-criticism-of-mugabe-racist/#comment-56681</link>
		<dc:creator>This ain&#8217;t Hell, but you can see it from here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sunday link fest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4615#comment-56681</guid>
		<description>[...] The American Pundit finds a politician who not only defends Obama and his posse, but he defends Mugabe in the same tone. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The American Pundit finds a politician who not only defends Obama and his posse, but he defends Mugabe in the same tone. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Former Weather Underground Member Blogging for Obama by bobf</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/25/former-weather-underground-member-blogging-for-obama/#comment-56581</link>
		<dc:creator>bobf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4599#comment-56581</guid>
		<description>There's a video of an interview with former Weather Underground activist David Gilbert posted on the YouTube site at the following link, which might interest you and your readers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OVW9BIgyYM&#38;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a video of an interview with former Weather Underground activist David Gilbert posted on the YouTube site at the following link, which might interest you and your readers:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OVW9BIgyYM&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OVW9BIgyYM&amp;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Louisiana: We Can&#8217;t Kill You? Fine, We&#8217;ll Castrate You Instead by DYSPEPSIA GENERATION &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Louisiana: We Can’t Kill You? Fine, We’ll Castrate You Instead</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/26/louisiana-we-cant-kill-you-fine-well-castrate-you-instead/#comment-55025</link>
		<dc:creator>DYSPEPSIA GENERATION &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Louisiana: We Can’t Kill You? Fine, We’ll Castrate You Instead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4607#comment-55025</guid>
		<description>[...] Read it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Feb 2008: Obama Says He Supports DC Gun Ban by Supreme Court Confirms Individual Right to Bear Arms &#124; shyspeak.net</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/26/feb-2008-obama-says-he-supports-dc-gun-ban/#comment-54911</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court Confirms Individual Right to Bear Arms &#124; shyspeak.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4608#comment-54911</guid>
		<description>[...] Complete coverage at Hot Air; American Pundit: Another Obama flip-flop: He was for the ban, before he was against [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Complete coverage at Hot Air; American Pundit: Another Obama flip-flop: He was for the ban, before he was against [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beware of Republicans Pro-Obama Rappers Bringing Up Obama&#8217;s Race by Benson</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/25/beware-of-republicans-pro-obama-rappers-bringing-up-obamas-race/#comment-54791</link>
		<dc:creator>Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4597#comment-54791</guid>
		<description>"He couldn’t possibly screw up as much as Bush has."

Really? You don't happen to remember the Carter years, do you, Don? Carter talked about change and yet was an empty suit, too.

The Misery Index was in the area of 28, we were being taxed up our ass, you could only buy gas on certain days, and the country was overall miserable. If you don't think it can get worse than Bush, just wait. It has been before, it can be again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He couldn’t possibly screw up as much as Bush has.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? You don&#8217;t happen to remember the Carter years, do you, Don? Carter talked about change and yet was an empty suit, too.</p>
<p>The Misery Index was in the area of 28, we were being taxed up our ass, you could only buy gas on certain days, and the country was overall miserable. If you don&#8217;t think it can get worse than Bush, just wait. It has been before, it can be again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beware of Republicans Pro-Obama Rappers Bringing Up Obama&#8217;s Race by don</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/25/beware-of-republicans-pro-obama-rappers-bringing-up-obamas-race/#comment-54790</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4597#comment-54790</guid>
		<description>And he'll be your next president. He couldn't possibly screw up as much as Bush has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And he&#8217;ll be your next president. He couldn&#8217;t possibly screw up as much as Bush has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Former Weather Underground Member Blogging for Obama by Sparky</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/25/former-weather-underground-member-blogging-for-obama/#comment-54679</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4599#comment-54679</guid>
		<description>I'm sure Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, and other past and future serial killers will and would support Obama.  Obama would be willing to talk with them, maybe even give them a pardon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, and other past and future serial killers will and would support Obama.  Obama would be willing to talk with them, maybe even give them a pardon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beware of Republicans Pro-Obama Rappers Bringing Up Obama&#8217;s Race by Arid Zona</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/25/beware-of-republicans-pro-obama-rappers-bringing-up-obamas-race/#comment-54200</link>
		<dc:creator>Arid Zona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4597#comment-54200</guid>
		<description>Mr. Barack Obama is a "Turtle on a fence post."  You are driving down a country lane and you see a turtle on the top of a fence post.  You know that the turtle doesn't belong up there and you wonder, "what idiot put the turtle up there in the first place?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Barack Obama is a &#8220;Turtle on a fence post.&#8221;  You are driving down a country lane and you see a turtle on the top of a fence post.  You know that the turtle doesn&#8217;t belong up there and you wonder, &#8220;what idiot put the turtle up there in the first place?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s Time for Another Loaded National Poll by Brennan P. Monaco &#187; Gallup: McCain, Obama Tied Nationally</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/24/its-time-for-another-loaded-head-to-head-poll/#comment-54087</link>
		<dc:creator>Brennan P. Monaco &#187; Gallup: McCain, Obama Tied Nationally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4590#comment-54087</guid>
		<description>[...] polls, which purported that Sen. Obama leads Sen. McCain by 15 and 12 points respectively. As other bloggers have noted, though, those polls weren&#8217;t exactly evenly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] polls, which purported that Sen. Obama leads Sen. McCain by 15 and 12 points respectively. As other bloggers have noted, though, those polls weren&#8217;t exactly evenly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mass. Dem to Child Rape Victims: I&#8217;ll Ruin Your Life by benning</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/24/mass-dem-to-child-rape-victims-ill-ruin-your-life/#comment-53918</link>
		<dc:creator>benning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4591#comment-53918</guid>
		<description>Is Massachusetts still a part of the USA? If so, why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Massachusetts still a part of the USA? If so, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s Time for Another Loaded National Poll by benning</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/24/its-time-for-another-loaded-head-to-head-poll/#comment-53908</link>
		<dc:creator>benning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4590#comment-53908</guid>
		<description>What surprises me is that anybody pays the slightest attention to Polls. Or that the Left continues to pretend that they matter.

A phony Poll? Heavens! 

*meh!*

If polling mattered Carter would have served two dismal terms, Mondale would have succeeded him, and maybe Edward "I think I'll have another, just for the road" Kennedy might even have been the President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What surprises me is that anybody pays the slightest attention to Polls. Or that the Left continues to pretend that they matter.</p>
<p>A phony Poll? Heavens! </p>
<p>*meh!*</p>
<p>If polling mattered Carter would have served two dismal terms, Mondale would have succeeded him, and maybe Edward &#8220;I think I&#8217;ll have another, just for the road&#8221; Kennedy might even have been the President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama in April &#8216;04: We Shouldn&#8217;t Withdraw From Iraq, We Should Finish the Mission by Stephan Tawney</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/11/obama-in-april-i-never-said-troops-should-be-withdrawn-from-iraq/#comment-53308</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Tawney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4521#comment-53308</guid>
		<description>How do you take:

"No, no, I’ve never said troops should be withdrawn."

Out of context?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you take:</p>
<p>&#8220;No, no, I’ve never said troops should be withdrawn.&#8221;</p>
<p>Out of context?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama in April &#8216;04: We Shouldn&#8217;t Withdraw From Iraq, We Should Finish the Mission by Kuni</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/11/obama-in-april-i-never-said-troops-should-be-withdrawn-from-iraq/#comment-53294</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4521#comment-53294</guid>
		<description>So where is the rest of the interview so we have context and to see if there are qualifiers?

Anyone can quote someone out of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where is the rest of the interview so we have context and to see if there are qualifiers?</p>
<p>Anyone can quote someone out of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Since When Is the NYT Worried About Credibility? by Ben K</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/21/since-when-is-the-nyt-worried-about-credibility/#comment-52604</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4581#comment-52604</guid>
		<description>Exactly......great point on the McCain story angle.  They had no problem doing it then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly&#8230;&#8230;great point on the McCain story angle.  They had no problem doing it then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Team Obama Dumps Obama Seal by Ben K</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/23/team-obama-dumps-obama-seal/#comment-52602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4584#comment-52602</guid>
		<description>I cant believe anyone thought that would actually be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe anyone thought that would actually be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Durbin: Those Who Attack Michelle Obama Go To Hell by Harold</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/11/durbin-those-who-attack-michelle-obama-go-to-hell/#comment-51993</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4522#comment-51993</guid>
		<description>Maybe all those whites that vote for Obama can help Michelle paint the whitehouse black.

Now the scene in Washington will be nothing but blacks and their white lackeys kissing A** and begging to whipped like dogs.  Rail on until this once great nation is destroyed but the retribution payments made for the civil war and cleans out the treasury. No nation ruled in any manner by a black has made it into prosperity.  Go to Africa and see the great states that were there when the whites operated the governments and see them now!  Not one is a real country but filled with garbage and trash. Africa is what America will look like after the great OBAMA become president. He us a joke and a know nothing con man with a bunch of idiots hailing him as a hero who has yet to even have a bill passed in congress.  Seems the Rev Wright is getting close to his curse on America becoming a reality.  

Just maybe the thinking people will wake up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe all those whites that vote for Obama can help Michelle paint the whitehouse black.</p>
<p>Now the scene in Washington will be nothing but blacks and their white lackeys kissing A** and begging to whipped like dogs.  Rail on until this once great nation is destroyed but the retribution payments made for the civil war and cleans out the treasury. No nation ruled in any manner by a black has made it into prosperity.  Go to Africa and see the great states that were there when the whites operated the governments and see them now!  Not one is a real country but filled with garbage and trash. Africa is what America will look like after the great OBAMA become president. He us a joke and a know nothing con man with a bunch of idiots hailing him as a hero who has yet to even have a bill passed in congress.  Seems the Rev Wright is getting close to his curse on America becoming a reality.  </p>
<p>Just maybe the thinking people will wake up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sen. Webb Sides With McCain on Oil Exploration by 4bob</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/20/sen-webb-sides-with-mccain-on-oil-exploration/#comment-51979</link>
		<dc:creator>4bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4569#comment-51979</guid>
		<description>McCain, with Alaska Gov Sarah Palin as his Veep, gain tremendously in this energy dabate.  A commenter on another post says it much better than I can, in touting Palin:

"They say McCain reads the blogs, so here goes -- 

Senator McCain- Don't let the campaign kibbitzers muddle things up.

First and foremost, Sarah Palin shares your values. She killed the bridge to nowhere. Need we say more? 

As for the politics, Sarah Palin transcends geography. Her constituency, like yours, goes beyond state lines.

She will get your ticket access to voters all over the country based on who she is and what she stands for. Because she's young, a woman, a mother with young kids, she will grab media attention more than any other potential candidate.

Gov. Palin also has a son in the active duty military. You have very wisely taken your son's service in Iraq off the table as a campaign talking point. That is and should be respected. But others can talk about it and reflect on what it means. 

A McCain-Palin administration would be the first in memory which has family members in uniform during wartime from both the President and Vice President. That would be a powerful statement as to the importance of national service, especially in uniform.

Most importantly, any Vice President should be ready to step up and serve in the event she is needed. Frankly, who is really ever ready? Gov. Palin is as ready as anybody, she is a quick learner, and in her public career has exhibited the courage and decisiveness needed for a great leader. 

Godspeed to you in your campaign and in making this important decision."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain, with Alaska Gov Sarah Palin as his Veep, gain tremendously in this energy dabate.  A commenter on another post says it much better than I can, in touting Palin:</p>
<p>&#8220;They say McCain reads the blogs, so here goes &#8212; </p>
<p>Senator McCain- Don&#8217;t let the campaign kibbitzers muddle things up.</p>
<p>First and foremost, Sarah Palin shares your values. She killed the bridge to nowhere. Need we say more? </p>
<p>As for the politics, Sarah Palin transcends geography. Her constituency, like yours, goes beyond state lines.</p>
<p>She will get your ticket access to voters all over the country based on who she is and what she stands for. Because she&#8217;s young, a woman, a mother with young kids, she will grab media attention more than any other potential candidate.</p>
<p>Gov. Palin also has a son in the active duty military. You have very wisely taken your son&#8217;s service in Iraq off the table as a campaign talking point. That is and should be respected. But others can talk about it and reflect on what it means. </p>
<p>A McCain-Palin administration would be the first in memory which has family members in uniform during wartime from both the President and Vice President. That would be a powerful statement as to the importance of national service, especially in uniform.</p>
<p>Most importantly, any Vice President should be ready to step up and serve in the event she is needed. Frankly, who is really ever ready? Gov. Palin is as ready as anybody, she is a quick learner, and in her public career has exhibited the courage and decisiveness needed for a great leader. </p>
<p>Godspeed to you in your campaign and in making this important decision.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Redefines the Word &#8220;Huge&#8221; by shyspeak.net &#183; Obama Balks at Public Financing</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/20/obama-redefines-the-word-huge/#comment-50847</link>
		<dc:creator>shyspeak.net &#183; Obama Balks at Public Financing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4575#comment-50847</guid>
		<description>[...] MORE: Webloggin calls out Obama on lies! So does Hot Air! Wake up America does, too! As does the Right Wing Nut House! And The American Pundit! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MORE: Webloggin calls out Obama on lies! So does Hot Air! Wake up America does, too! As does the Right Wing Nut House! And The American Pundit! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FactCheck On Obama&#8217;s Claim of Lobbyists Fueling McCain by Obama Redefines the Word &#8220;Huge&#8221; : The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/20/factcheck-on-obamas-claim-of-lobbyists-fueling-mccain/#comment-50739</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Redefines the Word &#8220;Huge&#8221; : The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4574#comment-50739</guid>
		<description>[...] FactCheck On Obama&#8217;s Claim of Lobbyists Fueling McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FactCheck On Obama&#8217;s Claim of Lobbyists Fueling McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Breaks Promise, Bypasses Public Financing by Stephan Tawney</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/19/obama-breaks-promise-bypasses-public-financing/#comment-50696</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Tawney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4566#comment-50696</guid>
		<description>"Sure, he is positioning so there is less of a hit to him if he opts out, but that is because the media and McCain are portraying him as already having pledged."

Uh, his website states: "Barack Obama just announced a major strategic decision -- this campaign will not participate in the broken public financing system for the general election."

He's already opted out, without "aggressively pursue an agreement" with the Republican nominee. Even the NYT, not exactly a conservative paper, recognized that he broke his pledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sure, he is positioning so there is less of a hit to him if he opts out, but that is because the media and McCain are portraying him as already having pledged.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh, his website states: &#8220;Barack Obama just announced a major strategic decision &#8212; this campaign will not participate in the broken public financing system for the general election.&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s already opted out, without &#8220;aggressively pursue an agreement&#8221; with the Republican nominee. Even the NYT, not exactly a conservative paper, recognized that he broke his pledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Breaks Promise, Bypasses Public Financing by Jeb Bush</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/19/obama-breaks-promise-bypasses-public-financing/#comment-50689</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeb Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4566#comment-50689</guid>
		<description>This is really being mischaracterized.

Obama statement said "If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

1) He must become the nominee
2) He must then come up with an agreement

This is being presented as him saying "Yeah, of course, no matter what." Problem is, he never said that.

Sure, he is positioning so there is less of a hit to him if he opts out, but that is because the media and McCain are portraying him as already having pledged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really being mischaracterized.</p>
<p>Obama statement said &#8220;If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.&#8221;</p>
<p>1) He must become the nominee<br />
2) He must then come up with an agreement</p>
<p>This is being presented as him saying &#8220;Yeah, of course, no matter what.&#8221; Problem is, he never said that.</p>
<p>Sure, he is positioning so there is less of a hit to him if he opts out, but that is because the media and McCain are portraying him as already having pledged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drudge: House Dems Call for Nationalization of Refineries by Steve</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/18/drudge-house-dems-call-for-nationalization-of-refineries/#comment-49360</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4562#comment-49360</guid>
		<description>That is unbelievable. Well, not really, but you know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is unbelievable. Well, not really, but you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MoveOn.org&#8217;s Confusing New Ad by The Obligatory MoveOn Ad Parody : The American Pundit</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/17/moveonorgs-confusing-new-ad/#comment-49322</link>
		<dc:creator>The Obligatory MoveOn Ad Parody : The American Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4543#comment-49322</guid>
		<description>[...] Morrissey actually has a great rebuttal to MoveOn&#8217;s real ad here. It&#8217;s worth a read. As I pointed out, &#8220;Alex&#8221; would be 9 at the end of McCain&#8217;s hypothetical second term. Furthermore, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morrissey actually has a great rebuttal to MoveOn&#8217;s real ad here. It&#8217;s worth a read. As I pointed out, &#8220;Alex&#8221; would be 9 at the end of McCain&#8217;s hypothetical second term. Furthermore, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Muslims Removed from Picture at Obama Campaign Rally by [snapped shot] It&#8217;s Not Photoshop:™ Headscarves Shunned from Obama Event &#124; Old Dominion Blog Alliance</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/18/muslims-removed-from-picture-at-obama-campaign-rally/#comment-49252</link>
		<dc:creator>[snapped shot] It&#8217;s Not Photoshop:™ Headscarves Shunned from Obama Event &#124; Old Dominion Blog Alliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4556#comment-49252</guid>
		<description>[...] didn't result in a really embarrassing attempt at Photoshop-correction after the fact.  See-also:  The American Pundit, Dollard (heh), Confederate Yankee, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] didn&#8217;t result in a really embarrassing attempt at Photoshop-correction after the fact.  See-also:  The American Pundit, Dollard (heh), Confederate Yankee, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, AP, Pay Up! by Stephan Tawney</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/18/hey-ap-pay-up/#comment-49243</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Tawney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4554#comment-49243</guid>
		<description>JR,

I've heard of the MBA elsewhere (I believe Glenn Reynolds is a member), but they certainly don't speak on behalf of the vast majority of blogs. I've certainly never given them authorization to speak on my behalf, and neither have millions of other blog owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard of the MBA elsewhere (I believe Glenn Reynolds is a member), but they certainly don&#8217;t speak on behalf of the vast majority of blogs. I&#8217;ve certainly never given them authorization to speak on my behalf, and neither have millions of other blog owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, AP, Pay Up! by JR</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/18/hey-ap-pay-up/#comment-49241</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4554#comment-49241</guid>
		<description>I read the other day that "Robert Cox" of the "Media Bloggers Association" would be meeting with the Associated Press to discuss a possible agreement between the two parties for using AP content.

I guess I wonder who the hell that guy (Cox) thinks he is to have the arrogance to believe that he has any standing in determining what position any or all other blogs would deem acceptable.  More importantly, why would anyone give the AP the benefit of discourse when they threw down the gauntlet quite unexpectedly and contretely on what is already defined in law/statute under Transformative Fair Use.

Is this just a bumpus organization trying to establish legitimacy in a self-proclaimed representation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the other day that &#8220;Robert Cox&#8221; of the &#8220;Media Bloggers Association&#8221; would be meeting with the Associated Press to discuss a possible agreement between the two parties for using AP content.</p>
<p>I guess I wonder who the hell that guy (Cox) thinks he is to have the arrogance to believe that he has any standing in determining what position any or all other blogs would deem acceptable.  More importantly, why would anyone give the AP the benefit of discourse when they threw down the gauntlet quite unexpectedly and contretely on what is already defined in law/statute under Transformative Fair Use.</p>
<p>Is this just a bumpus organization trying to establish legitimacy in a self-proclaimed representation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, AP, Pay Up! by Nevaar</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/18/hey-ap-pay-up/#comment-49238</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4554#comment-49238</guid>
		<description>Oh, hey...  I just copyrighted the above phrase after I posted it.  Sucks to be AP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, hey&#8230;  I just copyrighted the above phrase after I posted it.  Sucks to be AP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, AP, Pay Up! by Nevaar</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/18/hey-ap-pay-up/#comment-49237</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4554#comment-49237</guid>
		<description>But see, when AP does it, it's fair use because the average blogger is a non-commercial entity with no rights under modern US Copyright law.  HAHA!!!!  Bloggers, you lose!  BigBiz Win cuz WE can afford it and YOU cannot!

ALL YOUR WORDS ARE BELONG TO US!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But see, when AP does it, it&#8217;s fair use because the average blogger is a non-commercial entity with no rights under modern US Copyright law.  HAHA!!!!  Bloggers, you lose!  BigBiz Win cuz WE can afford it and YOU cannot!</p>
<p>ALL YOUR WORDS ARE BELONG TO US!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Muslims Removed from Picture at Obama Campaign Rally by snapped shot</title>
		<link>http://amerpundit.com/2008/06/18/muslims-removed-from-picture-at-obama-campaign-rally/#comment-49235</link>
		<dc:creator>snapped shot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amerpundit.com/?p=4556#comment-49235</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It's Not Photoshop:™ Headscarves Shunned from Obama Event...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Democratic party is the new standard-bearer for unity and tolerance, after all:

Two Muslim women at Barack Obama’s rally in Detroit Monday were barred from sitting behind the podium by campaign volunteers seeking to prevent the women’s heads...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It&#8217;s Not Photoshop:™ Headscarves Shunned from Obama Event&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Democratic party is the new standard-bearer for unity and tolerance, after all:</p>
<p>Two Muslim women at Barack Obama’s rally in Detroit Monday were barred from sitting behind the podium by campaign volunteers seeking to prevent the women’s heads&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
